Why Physical Water Treatment Alone Is Sometimes Not Enough
While our physical water treatment methods such as ultrasound, catalysts, biosignal techniques and microbubbles are effective in many cases, they are not always sufficient on their own. In certain applications and under certain conditions chemical treatment remains necessary to ensure consistent and legally compliant water quality.
Our Solution: Smart Chemical Support with Lower Dosing
We offer targeted chemical support that complements your existing physical treatment system, allowing:
Substantial decrease in chemical demand
Enhanced biofilm control and residual protection
Compliance with regulatory shock treatment protocols
Improved water safety with minimal environmental impact
Whether you’re looking to meet legal standards, prevent production interruptions, or simply optimize your water treatment system, we can provide a balanced, efficient solution that combines the best of physical and chemical treatment.
Comparison of Chlorine-Based Water Treatment Methods
1️⃣ Chlorine Dioxide (ClO₂)
🧪 Production Method
ClO₂ is produced on-site through a chemical reaction between sodium chlorite (NaClO₂) and an acid (HCl or H₂SO₄).
⚙️ Required Chemicals and Equipment
Sodium chlorite solution (25%)
Acid (HCl or H₂SO₄)
ClO₂ generator (mixing chamber, gas exhaust, dual dosing)
✅ Advantages
Highly effective against biofilm, algae, bacteria, viruses
No THM/AOX formation
Low dosage required, wide pH range
❌ Disadvantages
High operating costs (OPEX) and medium to high investment costs (CAPEX)
Explosion risk at high concentrations
Formation of chlorite and chlorate
☢️ By-products
Production: NaCl (salt)
Use: Chlorite (ClO₂⁻), chlorate (ClO₃⁻)
🏭 Examples
ProMinent, Grundfos, Siemens OSEC
2️⃣ Sodium Hypochlorite (NaOCl)
🧪 Production Method
Industrial production by reacting chlorine gas with sodium hydroxide.
⚙️ Required Chemicals and Equipment
Purchased NaOCl solution
Storage tank, dosing pump, optional control system
✅ Advantages
Inexpensive, simple application
Well-known technology
❌ Disadvantages
Unstable over time in storage
Forms THM and AOX in the presence of organics
Adds salt to the system
pH-sensitive
☢️ By-products
THMs (e.g., chloroform), AOX, Na⁺ and Cl⁻ ions
🏭 Examples
Hayward, Kemira, Javel
3️⃣ Chlorine Gas via Membrane Electrolysis (Cl₂ in situ)
🧪 Production Method
Electrolysis of brine (NaCl solution) generates Cl₂ and NaOH.
⚙️ Required Chemicals and Equipment
Salt + demineralized water
Electrolysis unit
Hydrogen gas exhaust and safety systems
Dosing and pH control
✅ Advantages
No chemical storage required
Low operating cost
Consistent, pure production
Environmentally friendlier (on-site production)
❌ Disadvantages
High CAPEX
Hydrogen gas safety risk
Salt accumulation in recirculation systems
☢️ By-products
H₂ gas, NaOH, THMs, AOX
🏭 Examples
Aguabel, Evoqua, De Nora
4️⃣ Stabilized Hypochlorous Acid (HOCl)
🧪 Production Method
Electrochemical production from water, salt, and acid, stabilized at pH 5.5–6.5.
⚙️ Required Chemicals and Equipment
Demineralized water, salt, acid or HOCl generator
✅ Advantages
High antimicrobial effectiveness
Low corrosion risk
No THM or AOX formation
Safe for plants
❌ Disadvantages
Limited stability over time
Relatively new, less field experience
Moderate OPEX
☢️ By-products
Minimal salt residues
🏭 Examples
EcoloxTech, Decon7, Clarion Water
📊 Summary Table:
Aspect | ClO₂ | NaOCl | Cl₂ via electrolysis | Stabilized HOCl |
---|---|---|---|---|
Production method | Chemical (on-site) | Industrial | On-site electrolysis | Electrochemical (on-site) |
Required supplies | NaClO₂, acid, generator | NaOCl solution, pump | Salt, electrolysis unit | Salt, acid, HOCl unit |
CAPEX | Medium–high | Low | High | Medium |
OPEX | High | Low | Low | Moderate |
Environmental impact | Chlorite, chlorate | THM, AOX, salt | THM, AOX, H₂, salt | Low |
By-products | Chlorite, chlorate | THM, AOX | NaOH, H₂, THM | Minor salt |
Effectiveness | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
pH Sensitivity | Low | High | Medium | Low |